BlueHost vs. SiteGround (Review Comparison)

not reliable! Website has been going down everyday. loosing emails. tech sucks. they have no idea what is going on or when it will be fixed. they did remind me of the tos and that they dont have refunds.

Go for SiteGround ▶

Or try out BlueHost ▶

Thanks for taking time to watch this video. This area may have affiliate links, which means a small commission is made if bought. However, Income Nook recommends trusted products and services. Thanks for your support!


Bluehost vs Siteground (Review Comparison)

Between Bluehost or SiteGround, there is definitely a winner in our book at Income Nook.

You’ll want to choose rightly from the start. When you’re looking to make money with online website, it’s best to avoid frustration over service time or storage space when you know what’s needed beforehand.

SiteGround was founded in 2004 in Bulgaria, BlueHost in 2003 in Utah. And SiteGround has less popularity, with BlueHost’s sales reach being larger over time. Popular is not necessarily better however.

For you perhaps, some study is in order, to help determine what’s needed. Both hosting platforms are relatively inexpensive. After all, making a business in the offline brick-and-mortar world is where costs really begin to add up.

It’s just so much cheaper to begin online with a business plan instead. For beginning online business, which site hosting company is best to go with and offers top of the line service? So what features are great to have? What should concerns involve for daily website tasks and performance? Which one is cleaner, or has the better cPanel system?


First of all, it’s all about support. As a beginner or intermediate website owner, when questions or troubles arise, you’re probably going to want to have quick response times from the service itself.

One company shines in this area while the other lags drastically. BlueHost can take 2 to 3 days to respond sometimes, even to basic concerns. It is not worth it. Even if paying only a few extra bucks yearly, having peace of mind knowing the SiteGround support team is there can make a huge difference over time and set one at ease.

If you’re familiar with cPanel, transferring domains, technological issues and other concerns, maybe BlueHost is fine. If you’re okay with spending an extra 50 to $100 yearly then SiteGround is the better option. How much is your time worth? If you were to spend one full day each year on technological issues, would saving 50 to $100 be worth it?


SiteGround is known to have more servers, around 5 to 1 over the Bluehost capability. This can mean more uptime and overall faster speeds. These couple things are enough reason alone for paying more, should service not be deemed important. And having servers close by to site visitors can greatly enhance both speed and site functioning. In modern times, people are impatient and absolutely leave sites that load slow.

The difference between 1 second and 2 to 5 seconds in the page loading time can absolutely mean many opportunities lost. Be smart and pay a bit more for the right hosting. You won’t be disappointed with the overall speed and quality of SiteGround.

Even for uptime, BlueHost is outperformed by its more robust competitor. This is how long a site stays live without any interruptions. Both are strong here, but there are small advantages with uptime when choosing SiteGround.


This presentation contains images that were used under a Creative Commons License. Click here to see the full list of images and attributions –


No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.